Findings from a critical analysis of the 1st General Meeting(2006) held on the 25th March 2006(theme: Strategising for the revival of BHOBU), are so revealing and interesting and worth reading for adjustments by the various year groups.
Total attendance from 1952-2005 = (264)
Year group(s) Representation
52-60,63,65,68,80(15 difft yr gps) 0
61,64,70,81,84,87( 6 'difft yr gps) 1 rep each
69,72,82,83 ( 4 '' ''' '' ) 2 reps each
62,71,77,85,90,2005 (6 " " ) 3 reps each
86,75 (2 " " ') 4 reps each
88,74 (2 " ) 5 reps each
89,73 (2 " ") 6 reps each
98,97,92,79,78 (5 " ") 7 reps each
99,2001,2000 (3 " ") 8 reps each
95 9 reps
76,91 (2 "") 10 reps each
2002,2003 (2 " ") 12 reps each
93,2004 (2 " ") 15 reps each
96 16 reps
94 19 reps
6 attendees no year group indicated
Best year representation 19 94
2nd best " 19 96
3rd best " " 93 and 2004
If we are to grade these representation according to
Excellent,Very Good,Good,Fair,Poor and Very very poor, folks,you will notice that too many year groups did not do well at all in trying to get their fellow mates to attend that meeting.
If we are still using the year group strategy for the revival (which is still the case) then guys I fear there is so much work to be done by certain year groups.
Representation Analysis in percentages(%)
1st decade--------52-61 only 1 (one) rep( Dr Lawson) 0.39 % representation
2nd decade 62-71 10 reps 3.94% "
3rd decade 72-81 45 reps 17.7% "
4th decade 82-91 37 reps 14.57% "
5th decade 92-2001 114 reps 44.88 %
6th decade(half) 2002-'05 42 reps 16.54 %
As a result of the previous meeting's registration procedures which delayed our meeting a bit,we have resolved to group the year group list into 3 different folders for easy access to database recovery:
1st+2nd+6th decades in one folder
3rd+4th decades in one decade
5th decade dedicated folder.
